インデックス付き
  • 学術雑誌データベース
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • アカデミックキー
  • ジャーナル目次
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • サイテファクター
  • シマゴ
  • ウルリッヒの定期刊行物ディレクトリ
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWBオンラインカタログ
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ミアル
  • 大学補助金委員会
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • Google スカラー
このページをシェアする
ジャーナルチラシ
Flyer image

概要

Strategies for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Dermatological Dosage Forms

Isadore Kanfer

The assessment of the bioequivalence of topical products not intended for absorption into the systemic circulation has presented a formidable challenge over the years. In particular, dermatological dosage forms such as creams, ointments, lotions and gels, apart from those containing topical corticosteroids, cannot readily be assessed for bioequivalence using “conventional” methodology and the only recourse to-date has been to undertake tedious, time consuming and expensive clinical end-point trials for such products. Although the human skin blanching assay (HSBA), also known as the vasoconstriction assay (VCA) has been successfully used for dermatological products containing topical corticosteroids and the methodology has found formal acceptance by a number of regulatory agencies, e.g. the US FDA amongst others, no surrogate methodology for the bioequivalence assessment of other topical dermatological products such as those containing non- steroidal anti-in fl ammatory drugs, anti-fungals, antibiotics and antivirals has yet found favour with regulatory agencies. Application of the HSBA, Tape Stripping (TS) and Dermal Microdialysis (DMD) for the assessment of bioequivalence is described and the theoretical basis and prognosis for each technique is presente

免責事項: この要約は人工知能ツールを使用して翻訳されており、まだレビューまたは確認されていません