インデックス付き
  • 環境研究へのオンライン アクセス (OARE)
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • ジャーナル目次
  • シマゴ
  • ウルリッヒの定期刊行物ディレクトリ
  • Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA) へのアクセス
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • 国際農業生物科学センター (CABI)
  • レフシーク
  • 研究ジャーナル索引作成ディレクトリ (DRJI)
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者の舵取り
  • SWBオンラインカタログ
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ミアル
  • 大学補助金委員会
  • ユーロパブ
  • Google スカラー
このページをシェアする
ジャーナルチラシ
Flyer image

概要

Evaluation of Three External Marking Methods of Farmed Atlantic Salmon for the Future Use of Differentiating it From Wild Atlantic Salmon

Atle Mortensen, Oyvind J Hansen and Velmurugu Puvanendran

We evaluated different external marking methods for farmed salmon to differentiate it from wild salmon without any special tools. Three marking methods were tested: 1) Adipose fin (AF) removal, 2) Freeze branding (FB) and, 3) Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE). Location of the marking method on the fish, combination of marking methods and degree of AF removal were tested in three experiments. Atlantic salmon parr weighing 20 g were marked either with individual marks or in combination of two. Further all the fish were also PIT tagged. They were kept in freshwater tanks for 4 months and later after smoltification, smolts were transferred to sea cages and kept for another 4 months. At the end of four (freshwater phase) and ten (sea cages) months, growth, survival and mark retention were recorded. All these methods had no significant effects on growth and survival compared to the control (no mark but only PIT tagged). Our results showed that of these methods, only complete removal of the adipose fin met the requirements for mark retention and was the cheapest and easiest method to automate. However, a larger commercial scale long-term testing of the AF clipping is required prior to implementing it. Further development of an automated fin clipping in combination with vaccination and an open discussion with consumers, buyers, and environmental groups are also warranted.