インデックス付き
  • Jゲートを開く
  • グローバル インパクト ファクター (GIF)
  • オープンアーカイブイニシアチブ
  • ビューサーチ
  • 国際科学普遍研究協会
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • サイテファクター
  • シマゴ
  • ウルリッヒの定期刊行物ディレクトリ
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • レフシーク
  • 研究ジャーナル索引作成ディレクトリ (DRJI)
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • パブロン
  • Google スカラー
このページをシェアする
ジャーナルチラシ
Flyer image

概要

Comparison of Mercury Emissions in USA and China-The Way of Effective Control of Hg from the Power Plant

Haoyi Chen, Xiaolong Wang, Li Zhong, Shisen Xu and Tiancun Xiao

Coal-fired power plants are the largest sources of mercury in China as well as United States, accounting for nearly 50% of industrial mercury releases. USA consumed much more coal than China before 1987, while no Hg control measures had been taken during this period. There has been lots of background Hg emitted into air system, including those from mining, oil & gas extraction, coal combustion, volcanoes and geothermal et.al. However the coal combustion has been considered as the dominant sources. Since 2005, quite a few coal power plants started adopting mercury control measures based on the powder Active Carbon Injection (ACI) technology in USA, metallic Hg emission to air environment has been thus significantly reduced, but leading to Hg content in fly ash is up to 10 ppm, potentially a Hg pollution source if not disposed properly. Although short terms studies have showed little leachate of Hg occurred from the fly dust, there is a potential that the landfilled or dumped dust may be a possible source for the Hg leachate to contaminate underground water in long term, as Hg is mainly trapped as Hg2+ or other forms, which are either soluble or minor soluble in water and could go to water environment. Based on this analysis, a more safe and reliable Hg removal technology has been developed and tested.

免責事項: この要約は人工知能ツールを使用して翻訳されており、まだレビューまたは確認されていません