インデックス付き
  • 環境研究へのオンライン アクセス (OARE)
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • ジャーナル目次
  • シマゴ
  • ウルリッヒの定期刊行物ディレクトリ
  • Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA) へのアクセス
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • 国際農業生物科学センター (CABI)
  • レフシーク
  • 研究ジャーナル索引作成ディレクトリ (DRJI)
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者の舵取り
  • SWBオンラインカタログ
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ミアル
  • 大学補助金委員会
  • ユーロパブ
  • Google スカラー
このページをシェアする
ジャーナルチラシ
Flyer image

概要

A Bioaugmentation Agent in Super Intensive Marine Shrimp Farming System with Zero Water Exchange

Salência HR ,Mouriño JLP *,Ferreira GS ,Arantes RF ,Ubert M ,Ubert M ,Lapa KR ,Seiffert WQ

This study evaluated the feasibility of using Comambio®, commercial product for bioremediation, in superintensive system of Litopenaeus. vannamei with zero water exchange. First, the concentration was determined to bioaugmentation on the settleable solids (SSed) in water containing microbial flakes. The second stage consisted in testing the application frequency in weekly and biweekly basis upon performance of shrimp. Were described physical and chemical parameters of water quality in the treated trial and that without application. The concentration of 0.56 g/L was selected by reducing significantly (p<0.05) the SSed value. The frequency of weekly application promoted the chance of livelihood and increased the final biomass growth of the shrimp by 46.6% of growth rate, 17.0% in the final biomass and 10.23% of livelihood with regard to the control sample. Eventually, there was a dramatic drop in the SSed (63.4%) with Comambio® while the total suspended solids increased with the suspended fixed solids. On the other hand, the biochemical oxygen demand showed the least value, Comambio® and control, 70.2% and 17.4% respectively. Summing up the bioaugmentation agent declined the value of SSed, contributing to the growth and reducing feed conversion as well as the final livelihood biomass of the shrimp cultivation system. The total average gain in weight per fish was higher in the automatic feeding (89.50 g) than in manual (78.50 g). An FE of 20.9% was obtained in the automatic feeding and 18.6% in manual, in relation to their FCRs. A t-test, conducted at 5% significance level, indicated a significant difference in the two feeding methods

免責事項: この要約は人工知能ツールを使用して翻訳されており、まだレビューまたは確認されていません